Still No Charges 29 Days After Arrest of BDS Activist

October 20, 2009

mohammad

Update on the Arrest of Human Rights defender and activist Mohammad Othman by Addameer and Stop the Wall Campaign

[Ramallah, 20 October 2009] On Monday 19 October 2009, a court hearing at Salem military court, in the Northern West Bank, extended Mohammad Othman’s detention period for another 11 days. It has been 29 days now since human rights defender, Mohammad Othman was arrested at the Allenby Bridge Border Crossing between Jordan and the West Bank. Mohammad, who volunteers with the “Grassroots Stop the Wall Campaign”, was on his way back to Ramallah from an advocacy tour in Norway, during which he was engaged in a number of speaking events and meetings with government officials. Monday’s court hearing was Mohammad’s third since the moment of his arrest on 22 September 2009. The two previous hearings have consistently extended Mohammad’s detention period for 10 and 12 days respectively, although no clear allegations have been made against Mohammad and no external evidence was brought to the attention of the court. Arrests of individuals based on reasonable suspicions are admissible in the beginning of one’s detention. However, after one month of continuous interrogation, such suspicions need to be substantiated and built upon by external evidence if any fair trial standards are to be upheld. Based on Israeli military orders, a military judge can authorize the detention of Palestinian detainees for up to 90 days, which can be extended for another 90 days by the judge of the Military Appeal Court.

During the hearing, the Israeli interrogation police failed once again to provide any evidence justifying Mohammad’s arrest, but contended that an extension of his detention period was necessary for further interrogation. The military judge rejected the interrogators’ initial request to extend Mohammad’s detention period to 23 additional days, arguing that the period was too long, but agreed to a 10 day extension period, based on “secret information”, which was made available to him by representatives from the Israeli Security Agency (ISA). Military Judge Eliahu Nimni argued that the extension is required in order to end the interrogation and clarify suspicions against Mohammad. At the same time, he maintained that releasing Mohammad would constitute a security threat, despite the fact that no concrete suspicions of any alleged offences were made, thus siding with the interrogation police. Addameer appealed the court’s decision and the appeal hearing has been scheduled for Thursday, 22 October.

Read the rest of this entry »


Palestine Film Festival at the North of Nowhere Expo

October 15, 2009

NoNexpo2009

The Edmonton Small Press Association’s 2009 North of Nowhere Expo is featuring as part of its two week festival a full slate of programming focusing on Palestine in its Palestine Film Festival.

NoN Palestinian events during the festival are listed below. Visit the North of Nowhere website for full information or visit the Facebook event page.

Read the rest of this entry »


PSN General Meeting

October 13, 2009

palflag

International House Meeting Room
(8801-111 Street), U of A Campus
Thursday, October 22
4:30 – 6:00 pm

We’d like to invite all Palestine Solidarity Network supporters and those interested in getting more involved in activities in Edmonton in support of the people of Palestine to come to the first PSN general meeting of the year.

The meeting will be an opportunity to discuss PSN’s plans and events for the upcoming school year, volunteer opportunities and other ways to get involved with PSN. It will be an informal gathering, and new ideas for events or initiatives are always welcome.

If you have an idea that you think might fit into PSN’s work, please email psnedmonton@gmail.com so we can make time for discussion in the agenda.

Spread the word through the Facebook event page.


Palestine Reading Circle

October 13, 2009

darwish

In order to deepen our collective understanding of the situation in Palestine and the Palestinian people and to give Edmontonians the opportunity to discuss Palestinian issues, the Palestine Solidarity Network-Edmonton is forming a Palestine Reading Circle, which will explore books focused on Palestinian history, the reality of the occupation and Palestinian culture. Our intention is to read and discuss a variety of works, including fiction, non-fiction and poetry. People with all levels of experience and understanding are welcome.

Depending on interest, we plan to initially meet in an informal setting like a coffee shop or someone’s home about every six weeks for a couple of hours. The books we will read will be decided upon by the group and two or three will be decided ahead of time to ensure people are able to order the books ahead of time.

If you are interested in being part of the Palestine Reading Circle, please email psnedmonton@gmail.com and we will add your name to the list to receive updates about upcoming books and times/locations for meet-ups.

To kick off the Palestine Reading Circle, we’ve decided on the first book we’ll discuss: UK-based journalist Ben White’s new book, Israeli Apartheid: A Beginner’s Guide. The gathering to discuss the book is the evening of Thursday, November 19 from 6:00 pm – 8:00 pm. The location will be set at a later date depending on the interest we receive and will be sent out over the list about a week prior.

iabg

The book is 144 pages, and is a quick read which gives a good introduction to the political and human rights situation in Palestine. Information about the book is available here.

The book can be ordered through Amazon.ca, but we strongly encourage you to support local independent bookstores (Audreys downtown or Greenwoods on the southside) by asking them to special order the book if they don’t have it in stock. The Edmonton Public Library does not currently have a copy of the book in their collection, but you can request a copy.

Publishing information is:
Title: Israeli Apartheid: A Beginner’s Guide
Author: Ben White
Publisher: Pluto Press (UK) (August 2009)
ISBN-10: 0745328873
ISBN-13: 978-0745328874


Is Canada More Pro-Israel than the US?

October 12, 2009

harper

An article on the Conservative government’s pro-Israel stand written by Canadian author Yves Engler for the Electronic Intifada.

Is Canada more pro-Israel than the US?

In June, Israel began barring some North Americans with Palestinian-sounding names entry through Ben Gurion Airport. Forced to reroute through a land-border crossing that connects the West Bank with Jordan, their passports were stamped “Palestinian Authority only,” which prevents them from entering Israel proper.

The Obama Administration objected to the move by Israel that discriminates against American citizens of Palestinian origin. However, there has been no protest from Ottawa even though Time magazine and the Israeli daily Haaretz ran lengthy articles focusing on Palestinian Canadian businessmen harmed by this new policy. A few weeks ago the Globe and Mail reported that “Although some of the most high-profile cases of individuals being turned away involve Canadian citizens, the Harper government has, so far, made no protest.”

This silence bolsters claims by some commentators that under Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservative government, Canada has become (at least diplomatically) the most pro-Israel country in the world. Israeli officials concur. After meeting Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister, four other Conservative ministers and Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff in July 2009, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who has openly called for the expulsion of Palestinian citizens of Israel, commented:

“It’s hard to find a country friendlier to Israel than Canada these days. Members both of the coalition and the opposition are loyal friends to us, both with regard to their worldview and their estimation of the situation in everything related to the Middle East, North Korea, Iran, Sudan and Somalia. No other country in the world has demonstrated such full understanding of us.”

Read the rest of this entry »


Palestinian Organizations: ‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

October 5, 2009

gazabombing

The following statement was issued by Palestinian civil society organizations on October 3, 2009:

Yesterday, 2 October 2009, the Palestinian leadership—under heavy international pressure lead by the United States—deferred the draft proposal at the Human Rights Council endorsing all the recommendations of the UN Fact Finding Mission (the Goldstone Report). This deferral denies the Palestinian peoples’ right to an effective judicial remedy and the equal protection of the law. It represents the triumph of politics over human rights. It is an insult to all victims and a rejection of their rights.

The crimes documented in the report of the UN Fact Finding Mission represent the most serious violations of international law; Justice Goldstone concluded that there was evidence to indicate that crimes against humanity may have been committed in the Gaza Strip. Violations of international law continue to this day, inter alia, through the continuing Israeli-imposed illegal blockade of the Gaza Strip. The findings of the Mission confirmed earlier investigations conducted by independent Palestinian, Israeli and international organizations.

The injustice that has now been brought upon Palestinians has been brought upon everyone on this globe. International human rights and humanitarian law are not subject to discrimination, they are not dependent on nationality, religion, or political affiliation. International human rights and humanitarian law apply universally to all human beings.

The rule of law is intended to protect individuals, to guarantee their fundamental rights. Yet, if the rule of law is to be respected it must be enforced. World history, and the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land has shown us that as long as impunity persists, the law will continue to be violated; innocent civilians will continue to suffer the horrific consequences.

Justice delayed is justice denied. All victims have a legitimate right to an effective judicial remedy, and the equal protection of the law. These rights are universal: they are not subject to political considerations. In the nine months since Operation Cast Lead, no effective judicial investigations have been conducted into the conflict. Impunity prevails. In such situations, international law demands recourse to international judicial mechanisms. Victims’ rights must be upheld. Those responsible must be held to account.

The belief that accountability and the rule of law can be brushed aside in the pursuit of peace is misguided. History has taught us time and time again, that sustainable peace can only be built on human rights, on justice, and the rule of law. For many years in Palestine international law, and the rule of law, has been sacrificed in the name of politics, and cast aside in favor of the peace process. This approach has been tried, and it has failed: the occupation has been solidified, illegal settlements have continued to expand, the right to self-determination has been denied; innocent civilians suffer the horrific consequences. It is now time to pursue justice, and a peace built on a foundation of human rights, dignity, and the rule of law. In Justice Goldstone’s words, there is no peace without justice.

As human rights organizations we strongly condemn the Palestinian leaderships’ decision to defer the proposal endorsing all the recommendations of the Fact Finding Mission, and the pressure exerted by certain members of the international community. Such pressure is in conflict with States’ international obligations, and is an insult to the Palestinian people.

As human rights organizations concerned with rights and justice, we declare that we will double our efforts to seek justice for the victims of the violations of human rights and international law in oPt [Occupied Palestinian Territory] without delay.


Undersigned organizations: Adalah, Addameer, Aldameer, Al Haq, Al Mezan, Badil, Civic Coalition for Jerusalem, DCI-Palestine, ENSAN Centre, Independent Commission for Human Rights, Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Centre, Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, Ramallah Centre for Human Rights Studies, Women’s Centre for Legal Aid and Counselling.


York Students and Faculty Take United Stance in Defence of Free Speech on Campus

October 5, 2009

3274892737_f50467b531

October 1, 2009

York Faculty Members Rally to Pay Costly Fines Imposed on Students Against Israeli Apartheid

We are a concerned group of York faculty members—concerned for the rights of free speech at York, concerned for the right to dissent, concerned for Palestinian human rights.

During the Spring of this year, 40 of us agreed to make personal contributions to help Students Against Israeli Apartheid-York (SAIA-York) defray the cost of a $1000 fine imposed upon the club by the York administration following a February 12th demonstration in Vari Hall. We did so because we see these fines as part of a larger pattern of repression on those who speak out at York in defence of Palestinian human rights on our campus.

In recent years, York administrators have attempted to expel a student and to discipline a faculty member for speaking out on campus in support of Palestinian human rights. In addition, they have on numerous occasions disciplined and fined SAIA and its members. Such actions bring discredit to the university, and they create a climate hostile to free speech and legitimate dissent.

For this reason, we have chosen to support SAIA with our wallets. And we will do so again, should it be necessary. In the coming weeks and months, we will be informing the York community about further actions in defence of free speech and Palestinian human rights.

Sincerely,

Concerned Faculty For Palestinian Human Rights

-30-

Please join us in demanding that York University President Mamdouh Shoukri denounce the use of prohibitory fines and sanctions against student clubs like SAIA-York as an instrument to silence Palestine solidarity activism and free speech on campus. Direct your letters to mshoukri@yorku.ca and CC SAIA-York as well saiayork@riseup.net . Feel free to use the sample letter provided below, however you are strongly encouraged to write your own.

SAMPLE LETTER:

President Shoukri,

I am writing to you today to strongly denounce the punitive measures taken against Students Against Israeli Apartheid-York (SAIA-York), in which the club was suspended for a total of 30 days and fined $1000 (alongside an additional $250 charged directly to the student acount of one of its members). I find it both shameful and morally reprehensible to sanction SAIA-York so severely simply for organizing a Palestine solidarity rally at a time when the people of Gaza were being indiscriminately bombed by the Israeli military for 22 consecutive days without reprieve, culminating in the deaths of over 1,400 people – most of which were innocent civilians.

If York is truly ‘open to the world’, as its own mission statement proudly claims, the fundamental right of students to legitimate dissent and peaceful assembly on campus must remain paramount. Vari Hall is at the core of student life and activism on campus and its rightful claim as ‘student space’ must never be compromised or outlawed. As President of York, it is your responsibility to protect free speech on campus, not to sanction and police those who refuse to stay silent on issues of moral consequence. Should such repressive administrative measures as those levied against SAIA-York continue in the future, you will no doubt be hearing from me again!

Sincerely,

YOUR NAME


Answering Critics of the Boycott Movement

October 1, 2009

1_boycott-israel-campaign_2006_50_70_amer-shomali-basel-nasr1-185x300

An interesting piece by Sami Hermez written for the Electronic Intifada (October 1, 2009)

Over the last three years, the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel has been gaining stride. Individuals around the world have been joining this call, from organizing actions in supermarkets in France and Great Britain protesting Israeli products made in settlements, to filmmakers withdrawing movies from film festivals, to prominent Israelis making a public stand with the BDS movement. Only recently, a multi-billion dollar Norwegian wealth fund divested from the Israeli arms company Elbit, while other companies, like Veolia, a French conglomerate involved in building and managing the Jerusalem light-rail, have suffered setbacks due to the bad publicity the boycott movement has generated.

The list of successful BDS actions has now become too long to list, yet, there are still many out there who do not believe in this movement and have reservations on a number of grounds, offering two main concerns that are rarely tackled, and when they are it is only cursory. The first is the criticism of why a boycott movement against Israel and not countries like China, Sudan or the US. This claim often gets tagged on with the idea that this is due to an inherent anti-Semitism. The second concerns the argument that boycott is against dialogue, which often comes along with accusations that it promotes censorship and is a form of collective punishment.

Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 85 other followers